
Premier League Daily Report - 2026-09-30: Manchester City face severe sanctions after financial breaches verdict
Key Takeaways
- Manchester City were found guilty of almost all 115 Premier League financial charges and plan to appeal.
- Etihad Airways is seeking legal advice after rejecting findings linking its sponsorship to improper commercial arrangements.
- The Australian Professional Leagues will review the verdict because Melbourne City shares ownership with Manchester City’s group.
Manchester City face severe sanctions after financial breaches verdict
Manchester City were found guilty of almost all 115 Premier League financial charges on Tuesday, 29 September 2026. An independent commission concluded that the club had used “sham” commercial arrangements to inflate revenue and understate costs by more than £900 million between 2009 and 2018. Premier League chief executive Richard Masters called the case and verdict the most significant in the competition’s history. Possible punishments include a fine, points deduction, transfer restrictions, relegation or expulsion, while rival clubs could pursue compensation claims. The sanctions will be determined at a separate hearing by the independent commission.
City rejected the findings and said it would appeal, insisting that it had evidence supporting its position. The club’s challenge means the case is likely to remain unresolved while the appeal process develops, with the eventual punishment carrying consequences beyond the current squad and ownership structure. The verdict has also reopened debate over titles won during the period under investigation and the Premier League’s ability to regulate state-backed investment. Any points deduction or expulsion would fundamentally alter the competition, while a lesser sanction would still leave lasting reputational damage after a case that has lasted since 2018.
Etihad seeks legal advice after Manchester City findings
Etihad Airways said on Wednesday, 30 September 2026, that it was seeking legal advice after criticising the Premier League’s handling of the findings against Manchester City. The airline, City’s principal sponsor since 2009, said it categorically rejected any finding or implication that it had participated in improper commercial arrangements. The Premier League said City had used “sham” contracts as part of schemes that inflated revenue and understated costs by more than £900 million over nearly a decade. Etihad also said it had not been contacted or consulted during the commission process.
The sponsor’s response added a significant commercial dimension to a disciplinary case already threatening sporting sanctions and compensation claims. Etihad said it had not been given an opportunity to provide information or challenge material that might have reflected adversely on it, and legal advice will determine its next steps. The dispute could place further pressure on relationships around City’s commercial structure, particularly if the club’s appeal challenges the commission’s interpretation of sponsorship income. City have already rejected the verdict and pledged to fight it through the appropriate regulatory and legal forums.
Australian league vows to review Manchester City verdict
The Australian Professional Leagues said on Wednesday, 30 September 2026, that it would review the Premier League’s findings against Manchester City. The decision followed confirmation that City had been found guilty of almost all charges relating to financial breaches, including the use of “sham contracts” that allegedly boosted income by more than £900 million over nine years. Melbourne City share ownership with the English club through City Football Group, which also includes clubs such as New York City and Yokohama F. Marinos. The A-Leagues said Melbourne City had not been investigated over the dealings examined in England.
The review means the English verdict is already affecting a competition outside the Premier League, even before sanctions against Manchester City have been decided. Melbourne City’s association with the same ownership group makes governance and regulatory scrutiny the immediate concern, rather than any established finding against the Australian club. City have denied the charges and said they will appeal, so the A-Leagues’ assessment will have to account for a process that remains active. The episode also places renewed attention on the way multi-club ownership groups separate commercial, sporting and governance responsibilities across different leagues.
Klopp rejects prospect of claiming Liverpool titles from City
Jürgen Klopp said on Wednesday, 30 September 2026, that he was not preparing to claim Premier League titles if Manchester City were stripped of honours. The former Liverpool manager was responding to the independent commission’s guilty verdict and the possibility of sanctions including relegation or the removal of titles. Klopp said he had “big respect” for Pep Guardiola and City’s style of football, describing them as a top-class opponent. Liverpool repeatedly challenged City during Klopp’s tenure, making the verdict especially relevant to the history of their rivalry and the titles contested during that period.
Klopp’s response reflected the uncertainty surrounding any retrospective sporting punishment. He said he would wait to see what sanctions were imposed and stressed that he had nothing to do with the process, rather than lobbying for Liverpool to receive additional championships. City’s appeal must be resolved before questions over honours can be settled, while the commission’s findings have already changed the context around one of the Premier League’s defining eras. The comments also separated admiration for Guardiola’s football from the institutional allegations now facing the club and its ownership.
Frequently Asked Questions
What happened to Manchester City in the Premier League financial charges case?
Manchester City were found guilty of almost all 115 Premier League financial charges. Possible sanctions include a fine, points deduction, transfer restrictions, relegation or expulsion, but the punishment has not been decided.
What is happening with Manchester City’s Premier League appeal?
Manchester City rejected the findings and said it would appeal. The case is likely to remain unresolved while the appeal process develops.
Why is the Australian Professional Leagues reviewing the Manchester City verdict?
The Australian Professional Leagues will review the verdict because Melbourne City shares ownership with Manchester City through City Football Group. Melbourne City has not been investigated over the dealings examined in England.


